Platforms The record Method Company News Request a briefing
The portfolio

Decide it. Prove it. Account for it.

Three platforms on one loop. Each takes a stretch of the same problem and hands the next a decision somebody can check — and each leaves the same kind of record behind: inputs, tools called, outputs, and the name of the person who signed for it.

UEI UKELB3UV76V6 · CAGE 19S89

STARCHITECT v9 operator console: control groups, orbital theater, command card and queue
Decide it.
Live · flagship · Advanced reconnaissance STARCHITECT

The operating system for space wargaming and BMC3I

Space wargaming and BMC3I simulation built for the next decade of contested orbital operations. High-fidelity orbital mechanics (Orekit) and distributed adversarial AI turn raw space data into repeatable, defensible courses of action.

A working body of orbital simulation, instrumented for battle management, command, control, communications, and intelligence. Every number traces to a physics-engine output — and every operator commit is recorded.

The v9 operator console carries the grammar trained operators already read: control groups on hotkeys, a command card of every legal order, resources that force tradeoffs and refuse an order over budget, a decision clock, and a red cell that plays at machine speed. Gold is decision, cyan is telemetry, red is lethal and nothing else.

Measured results are shared in briefings.
Status
Operational
Physics core
Orekit
Mission set
SDA / PWSA
Integration
BMC3I
STARCHITECT readiness hub: next sortie, season standing, quals, squadron ladder
Readiness hub · crew standing and quals
STARCHITECT white cell: inject timeline and red-cell controls
White cell · injects at machine speed
STARCHITECT after-action review with measures
After action · measures (MOMs, MOEs, MOPs)
01 · WARGAMING ENGINE
Adversarial scenarios

Multi-actor scenarios with adversarial AI, stochastic event modeling, and human-in-the-loop branches for defensible course-of-action validation.

02 · BMC3I INTEGRATION
Joint by design

Native interfaces to the battle-management and command-and-control architecture, with standards-aligned data formats and decision-loop outputs scored against measures (MOMs/MOEs/MOPs).

03 · ON THE RECORD
Every commit, recorded

AI-assisted analysis. Every operator commit is recorded, so the record is the audit trail.

Hybrid-architecture multi-domain operations

Edge to core, and back.

Five domains sense at the edge — the domain space. One hybrid layer, designed to tolerate denied, disrupted, intermittent, and limited (DDIL) links, carries it to the core — the information and decision space. There, threat becomes measured courses of action (MOMs · MOEs · MOPs), verified by an operator, and battle management, command, control, communications, and intelligence (BMC3I) is pushed back to the edge at the speed the threat level demands.

Domain space · EdgeFind · Fix · Track
Space
SDA tracks · maneuvers · RF/EO custody
C4ISR
Air
ISR feeds · missile warning · air picture
C4ISR
Land
Ground sensors · fires · force posture
C4ISR
Maritime
Surface/subsurface tracks · AIS · radar
C4ISR
Cyber
Network telemetry · link health · intrusion
C4ISR
Hybrid layerTransport
Mesh, any path
Agnostic data paths · no single link
Store-and-forward
Designed for recovery on reconnect
Unified data
One record across domains
Cross-level sharing
DoD · IC · coalition · commercial
DDIL-tolerant · machine speed
Decision space · CoreInformation / decision space
1
Threat / response matrix
Threat level × pre-authorized response, per domain
2
TT&P + COA generation
Branches per scenario · kill-chain graph
3
Fast-forward adjudication
Physics + network wargame · Orekit · high-rate
4
Probability of success
Per scenario · measures: MOMs · MOEs · MOPs
5
Operator-verified decision
AI-assisted · every operator commit recorded
Combatant CommanderNational Command AuthorityMission partners · coalitionBusiness transaction model
Return · BMC3I to the edge

Battle management, command, control, communications, intelligence — pushed back into the domain space. The threat level decides who acts and how fast.

Target · Engage · Assess
Low
Who acts
Core deliberates · commander commits
Latency
Hours → days
What moves
Updated TT&P · re-plan · retasking
Elevated
Who acts
Core pushes ranked COAs · operator verifies
Latency
Minutes
What moves
COAs with probability of success · tasking
Imminent
Who acts
Edge acts on pre-authorized response matrix
Latency
Seconds · near-real-time sensor-to-COA
What moves
Effects · then report to core

TT&P = tactics, techniques & procedures · COA = course of action · Core = information / decision space · Edge = domain space. Print boards: Master flow · Latency curve · Domain lanes. Measured results are shared in briefings.

02 · Latency curve · Mission latency vs. urgency of needPDF ↗
STARCHITECT/ A HYPATIUS PLATFORMHybrid-Architecture Multi-Domain Operations · v2 · Nonproprietary
Mission latency vs. urgency of need

The need peaks in seconds. Most architectures answer in hours.

Time-sensitive targeting lives left of the minute mark. The threat level maps to that curve — and decides whether the edge acts, the core pushes, or the commander deliberates.

Probability of delivery · urgency of need  ·  f(performance, resilience)
100%
75%
50%
25%
SecMinHour12 hrsDayWeekMonthQtrYear
Mission latency · f(connectivity, autonomy, performance, collaborative behavior)Log scale · illustrative
Time-sensitive targeting
STARCHITECT is designed to close sensor-to-COA in near real time — inside the peak, not after it.
Imminent
Edge acts · response matrix
Elevated
Core pushes COAs
Low
Commander deliberates · re-plan
Find
Fix
Track
Sensing · the edge
ConnectivityLow latencyAutonomyIncreased autonomy at the nodePerformanceHigh-quality sensingResilienceHigh-pedigree informationCollaborativeRobust identification
Target
Engage
Assess
Communication / tasking · the core, pushed back
ConnectivityLow latency · machine-to-machineAutonomyIncreased automation of taskingPerformanceProbability of success per COAResilienceHigh information assuranceCollaborativeDiverse multi-domain paths
Tasking cycle todayPlanning → sending → accepting → executing → assessing → downlink → processing → dissemination sits at hours-to-quarter. The hybrid architecture collapses the middle steps to machine time; the response matrix removes them entirely for imminent threats.
Kill-chain phases per JP 3-60 · curve shape illustrative, derived from AFRL Small Satellite Portfolio hybrid-architecture concept · COA = course of actionSources: AFRL SSP · JP 3-60 · HYPATIUS platform directives
03 · Domain lanes · Five domains, five artifacts eachPDF ↗
STARCHITECT/ A HYPATIUS PLATFORMHybrid-Architecture Multi-Domain Operations · v2 · Nonproprietary
Domain space · the edge, lane by lane

Five domains. One architecture, five artifacts each.

Every lane carries the same chain — asset, model, code, analytics, data — and ends in an edge node that keeps fighting when the link is gone. That repetition is what makes the layer hybrid.

Domain1 · Asset2 · Model3 · Code4 · Analytics5 · DataEdge node
Space
SDA sensors
RF / EO custody · maneuvering objects
Orbital mechanics
Orekit · high-fidelity propagation
Maneuver detection
Custody handoff · autonomous at node
Track quality
Conjunction risk · MOPs
Ephemeris record
Catalog deltas · every run logged
Space edge
Designed to fight alone under DDIL
Air
ISR · missile warning
Airborne and overhead feeds
Flight + propagation
Kinematics · radar horizon
Track correlation
Single air picture at the node
Warning time
Detection probability · MOEs
Track record
Air picture history · provenance
Air edge
Designed to fight alone under DDIL
Land
Ground sensors · fires
Force posture · effectors
Terrain + posture
Line of sight · movement
Fires deconfliction
Pre-authorized responses
Effects · coverage
Mission outcome · MOMs
Position + order log
Who moved, when, on what basis
Land edge
Designed to fight alone under DDIL
Maritime
Surface · subsurface
AIS · radar · sonar contacts
Sea state + propagation
Environmental model
Contact fusion
Custody across sensors
Track confidence
Identification quality · MOPs
Contact record
AIS + track history
Maritime edge
Designed to fight alone under DDIL
Cyber
Network telemetry
Link health · intrusion signals
Network model
NS-3 · contested-link behavior
Path selection
Five-tier degradation ladder
Link availability
Latency · loss · MOPs
Event record
Telemetry + path decisions
Cyber edge
Designed to fight alone under DDIL
Every edge node feeds the hybrid layer Same five artifacts in every lane means the core reasons across domains on one record — and any lane keeps running on its own when the link drops.
DDIL = denied, disrupted, intermittent, limited · SDA = space domain awareness · measures: MOMs · MOEs · MOPsSources: USSPACECOM FY29–33 IPL · HYPATIUS platform directives

Sources: USSPACECOM FY29–33 IPL · DAF FY27 RDT&E · JP 3-60 · AFRL Small Satellite Portfolio hybrid-architecture concept · HYPATIUS platform directives. Curve shapes illustrative.

ALIDADE as an MCP tool server: four callers on the left, six tool groups in the middle, the run ledger on the right
Prove it.
In development · TBD 2027 · Capture decision intelligence
ALIDADE

ALIDADE

We do not guess. We engineer the win.

Capture decision intelligence for GovCon. Seven cited factors resolve into one probability of win, in three bands, with the gaps named — the colour is calculated, never chosen, and a mark and a word ride with it.

Teaming runs on consent: a partner is a handle until both sides agree to be named, and what each side can see is written down as a grant before the first message. Every tool an agent calls is attributable to a person, a grant and a scope. The run ledger is the product.

Built for delivery as an MCP tool server your agents call — in STARCHITECT, in your own client, or in the ALIDADE console.

Status
In development · TBD 2027
Scoring
7 factors · 3 bands
Teaming
On consent
Delivery
MCP tool server
ALIDADE command briefing: ranked pursuits and the gates awaiting a signature
Command · what needs a person today
ALIDADE agent and MCP control room with run ledger
Control room · the run ledger
ALIDADE proposal redline with compliance matrix
Bid Builder · redline and compliance matrix
CRATON audit binder: the fourteen SF 1408 areas, each answerable from the ledger
Account for it.
In development · TBD 2027

CRATON

DCAA-ready timekeeping and the SF 1408 binder

Timekeeping, charge codes, indirect rate pools and the audit binder for small government contractors. At launch CRATON keeps the four things a cost-type award asks you to prove, in one append-only ledger anyone can read.

Book the day whole, in quarter-hour increments, with nobody approving their own week. Nothing is charged without a code, and the code derives from the funding source. Fringe, overhead and G&A pools update when the ledger does. The binder is generated from the ledger on the day it is asked for, not assembled the night before.

The fourteen areas of the SF 1408 decide whether a small firm may hold a cost-type award at all. The last of them asks whether the system is in full operation — a compliant package nobody uses fails it. That question is CRATON's home screen.

Status
In development · TBD 2027
Standard
SF 1408 · 14 areas
Ledger
Append-only, hash-chained
Fit
Small teams
CRATON audit binder: the fourteen SF 1408 areas with their current state
The binder · fourteen areas, always current
CRATON run ledger: inputs, tools called, outputs and reviewer per run
The record · every run reviewable
CRATON indirect rate pools: fringe, overhead and G and A against ceiling
Rates · pools that follow the ledger
The loop

How the three compose.

The loop closes. What the record settles is what the next decision gets argued from — a debrief sharpens the next probability of win, a rate snapshot prices the next bid, a sortie changes what the next scenario has to survive.

STARCHITECT
Reasoning layer · live

Space wargaming and BMC3I simulation — courses of action a commander can take apart under a clock.

Detail →
ALIDADE
Capture layer · in development

Capture decision intelligence — seven cited factors and one probability of win a bid board can source.

Detail →
CRATON
Execution layer · in development

Hours, codes, rates and the SF 1408 binder — an append-only record an auditor can read.

Detail →

See the operating picture for your mission.

Request a briefing →